Weaponized Hurricanes for United Nations "Wildlands Network" & "Agenda 21"
Relocate Populations, Institute "Smart Cities" & "Wildland" areas
by Dillon Critique From; (substack)
Friday October 11 2024
https://www.blackboxpolitics.substack.com
I call them “Geo-Canes”. Hurricanes that are being manipulated or created through Geo-Engineering.
What is the United Nations Wildlands Network?
Short Answer: (1); Place 50% of the United States geographical areas into “wildlands” (no human activity). (2); Move the population into “sustainable communities” (Smart Cities)'; moving people out of the rural areas.
The Wildlands project (now called Wildlands Network and based in Florida) was first proposed by “Earth First’s” Dave Foreman, in 1991.
The goal is to eradicate any sign of human activity/life. Humans will be relocated by being pushed out of World Government designated “wildland areas”.
How will humans be pushed out of areas by force that have been deemed “Wildland areas” by World Government?
Geo-Canes (Geo-engineered/manipulated Hurricanes); is one of many ways to forcefully relocate populations and cause ‘anonymous’ destruction and geographical alterations or “Wildlands”.
Geo-Canes fall under the World Government Program labeled or known as; (“Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars”) being used on the population by World Government. There are many sub-programs under S.W.Q.W.; Geo-Engineering/Weather Warfare/Weather Modification, being one.
S.W.Q.W can also be known as 5th Generational Warfare. 5th Generational Warfare is defined as;
Fifth-generation warfare (5GW) is conducted primarily through non-kinetic military action, such as social engineering, misinformation, and cyberattacks, along with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, fully autonomous systems and Geo-Engineering/Weather modification. It is a war of "information and perception".
The general public does not know about Geo-Engineering (information) and perceives (perception) hurricanes as being natural and untouched by man. This is no longer the case in 2024 or even before 2024 really. It is a perfect attack vector/weapon on and uneducated and unsuspecting population at large.
The official UN map below shows the UN’s plan for America. We will be living in the light blue areas (human settlements), while most of the land will be off limits to humans (red, orange, yellow).
The “Wildlands Network” is one goal of many that falls under “United Nations Agenda 21”.
Mr. Foremen was a former board member of the “Sierra Club” and The Nature Conservancy stating;
“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with its full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”
Why are Florida & others being attacked by Geo-Canes? (Geo-Engineered Hurricanes)
In 1999, the Florida legislature passed the “Florida Forever program”, which authorized $3 billion in bonds to purchase land. In 2008, the program was reauthorized with an additional $3 billion in bonds to conserve land. The Florida Forever program has provided $6 billion for the acquisition of land.
As a result of Florida Forever, Florida agencies like DEP’s division of Land Management, and Fish and Wildlife are buying land under the Florida Forever program which states the purchases are for “conservation and recreation lands.”
However, the Wildlands Network states the land is for: “ ‘landscape connectivity’ – a connected system of conservation lands – has become widely recognized as essential for long-term ecological viability and wildlife survival, and with this recognition has come renewed interest in making a continental corridor from Québec to Florida, an Eastern ‘Wildway,’ a reality.”
This is not restrictive to just Florida, the people of Florida, other states and countries are suffering and dying due to World Government Agendas/Policy.
Again, “Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars” is being used to attack the population and carry out these agendas while the ‘elite’ hide behind the shadows.
How do you forcefully relocate populations and turn areas into “Wildlands” by force, without the population being the wiser to what’s happening, why or even knowing who’s attacking them?
Again, a program that is called “Silent weapons for Quiet Wars”. Weather Warfare/Weather Modification (Geo-Engineering) is being waged on the population via World Government.
Florida, other states and countries are being attacked in order to begin relocating populations and turn areas into “Wildlands” as per United Nations Agenda 21.
The cover story for these Geo-Engineering weather attacks is labeled as “Climate Change”.
Other states and countries will be next on the hit list. This will continue to be a reoccurring theme or pattern. Other events and attacks will be used as well.
Your Brief Introductory Video Education of Agenda 21 “Wildlands Network” & “Biodiversity Treaty”
Expert Henry Lamb on the Biodiversity Treaty and Wildlands Network
Brief Written Overview:
The usufruct principles of sustainable development first became public at the 1976 United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat I) held in Vancouver. For instance, the Preamble of Agenda Item 10 of the Conference Report states that:
Land…cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. The provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable.…” (Emphasis added)
Throughout this UN document, the socialist model for private property rights are set forth as the basis for future United Nations policy:
Public ownership or effective control of land in the public interest is the single most important means of…achieving a more equitable distribution of the benefits of development…. Governments must maintain full jurisdiction and exercise complete sovereignty over such land…. Change in the use of land…should be subject to public control and regulation…of the common good. (Emphasis added)
State control over private property has been central to every international treaty since the 1970s. The United Nations’ World Commission on Sustainable Development — formalized this into international policy when it published its report Our Common Future in 1987. This landmark report helped trigger a wide range of actions, including the UN “Earth Summits” — in 1992 and 2002, the International Climate Change Convention, The Convention on Biological Diversity and worldwide “Agenda 21″ programs. Agenda 21 is a 40 chapter master plan to reorganize national laws to the socialist principles of central control. The United States signed Agenda 21 during the 1992 Earth Summit at Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Chapter 15.3 requires “urgent and decisive action” be taken “to conserve and maintain genes, species and ecosystems, with a view to the sustainable management and use of biological resources.” To do this chapter 15.4 requires that “Governments…should:
(a) Press for the early entry into force of the Convention on Biological Diversity, with the widest possible participation; and
(b) Develop national strategies for the conservation of biological diversity and the sustainable use of biological resources.
Chapter 15.5 of Agenda 21 continues by stating that “conservation of ecosystems and natural habitats…should include the reinforcement of terrestrial… protected area systems…and promot[ion of] environmentally sound and sustainable development in areas adjacent to protected areas with a view to furthering protection of these areas.” The United Nations and its international allies designed the Convention on Biological Diversity to be the workhorse in fulfilling these requirements. The treaty was merely an 18-page outline (since removed/hidden) of what needed to be done. Senator Jesse Helms (R-NC) correctly called it “a preamble falsely described as a treaty.” The implementing language was to be added after enough nations ratified it to put it into force. Even so, Article 8 of the treaty uses almost identical language used in Agenda 21:
(a) Promote a system of protected areas or areas where special measures need to be taken to conserve biological diversity;
(e) Promote environmentally sound and sustainable development in areas adjacent to protected areas with a view to furthering protection of these areas.”
By August of 1993 the Clinton administration accepted Agenda 21’s challenge when it directed “natural resource and environmental agencies…develop a joint strategy to help the United States fulfill its existing international obligations (e.g. Convention on Biological Diversity, Agenda 21)…the executive branch should direct federal agencies to evaluate national policies…in light of international policies and obligations, and to amend national policies to achieve international objectives.” This effort became the primary reason for the need for vice president Gore and President Clinton to reinvent government.
To accomplish this, President Clinton also created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development. The council was comprised of green-oriented industrial leaders, natural resource cabinet heads and leaders of major environmental groups. The council produced a host of socialist guidelines to implement Agenda 21 in a series of documents under the banner of Sustainable America from 1996 to 1999. These became the official policies of the federal government and were heavily promoted by environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and foundations. All are centered on the usufruct concept of property.
The United Nations intended that the implementing language for the Biodiversity Treaty be taken from the Global Biodiversity Assessment (GBA), a 1040-page tome that ostensibly scientifically defined the reason and the methodology for protecting biodiversity. The GBA establishes the need for the usufruct concept:
— Property rights are not absolute and unchanging, but rather a complex, dynamic and shifting relationship between two or more parties, over space or time. Section 11.2.3.1.2.
— One option for ensuring against excessive species depletion is the allocation of property rights in order to create markets. Section 12.7.5
— A common characteristic of many ecosystems is that resources are non‑exclusive in their use: they are in the nature of local public goods. Property rights can still be allocated to the environmental public good, but in this case they should be restricted to usufructual or user rights. Harvesting quota, emissions permits and the development rights are examples of such rights. Section 12.7.5
— “The point here is that the reallocation of property rights implies the redistribution of assets.” section 12.7.5 (Italics added)
The usufruct concept of property had to be in place before any part of Agenda 21 and the Biodiversity Treaty could be implemented. Perhaps the most chilling, however, is that in order to protect biodiversity, the GBA called for placing vast areas into wilderness and protected from human use.
Representative areas of all major ecosystems in a region need to be reserved…. Reserved “blocks should be as large as possible…. Buffer zones should be established around core areas and corridors should connect these areas. This basic design is central to the Wildlands Project in the United States (Noss, 1992), a controversial…strategy…to expand natural habitats and corridors to cover as much as 30% of the us land area.” (Section 13.4.2.2.3)
In other words, the Wildlands Project was designed to be the cornerstone of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Although the ratification of the Convention on Biological Diversity was stopped in the U.S. Senate in 1994, explained below), millions of dollars are spent annually to implement it without benefit of the treaty. It has already destroyed the lives of thousands of people. Eventually, every American will experience its severe consequences.
Houston, North Carolina/Eastern US and Florida have all been under attack recently with Geo-Canes in order to further the implementation of World Government Agenda 21 “Wildlands Network”. -Dillon Critique from
(substack)
The strategy normally is accomplished in five steps:
Identify existing protected areas such as federal and state wilderness areas, parks, national monuments, refuges and other designated sites. They should be from 100,000 to 25 million acres in size. These are already wilderness or close to it. Such tracts would serve as “core reserves” completely off-limits to human activity.
Identify other multiple-use government land that can be politically forced into wilderness status. Roadless areas are highest priority, but existing roads can be closed if roadless areas are not available.
Create wilderness corridors along streams, rivers and mountain ranges that interconnect the core reserves.
Purchase, condemn or regulate private property to fill in the gaps where public land did not exist. Usufruct regulation is preferred because the government would not have to pay for the land.
Create buffer areas around land not in core reserves or interconnecting wilderness to manage them sustainably so they protect the core wilderness areas.
Wildlands Project co-author Reed Noss explains that in the core, corridor and buffer areas, “The collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans.”1 The Wildlands Project is the master plan for both Agenda 21 and the Biodiversity Treaty, and represents a grandiose design to transform at least half the land area of the continental United States into an immense “eco-park” cleansed of modern industry and private property. Says Noss;
One half of the land area of the 48 conterminous [United] States be encompassed in core [wilderness] reserves and inner corridor zones (essentially extensions of core reserves) within the next few decades…. Half of a region in wilderness is a reasonable guess of what it will take to restore viable populations of large carnivores and natural disturbance regimes, assuming that most of the other 50 percent is managed intelligently as buffer zone… Eventually, a wilderness network would dominate a region and thus would itself constitute the matrix, with human habitations being the islands.2
The Wildlands concept is largely the work of Dave Foreman, the principal founder of the eco-terrorist group Earth First! and a former member of the board of the Sierra Club. Foreman describes the Wildlands Project as an effort to “tie the North American continent into a single Biodiversity Preserve.” Foreman summarizes Wildlands as “a bold attempt to grope our way back to 1492” — that is, to repeal a half-millennium of Western civilization, with its unique blessings of material prosperity, technological progress, private property and individual rights. Indeed, the vision statement of the Wildlands Project is stunning in scope;
Our vision is simple: we live for the day when Grizzlies in Chihuahua have an unbroken connection to Grizzlies in Alaska; when Gray Wolf populations are continues from New Mexico to Greenland; when vast unbroken forests and flowing plains again thrive and support pre-Columbian populations of plants and animals; when humans dwell with respect, harmony, and affection for the land…3
John Davis, editor of Wild Earth, acknowledges that the Wildlands Project seeks nothing less than “the end of industrial civilization…. Everything civilized must go…”4
In this bizarre scheme, human civilization must be radically reconfigured, mines would be closed, roads torn from the landscape, timber harvesting stopped and human populations relocated. All of this is to be done, according to Wildlands co-founder Michael Soulé, in harmony with a prophetic vision: “The oracles are the fishes of the river, the fishers of the forest and articulate toads. Our naturalists and conservation biologists can help us translate their utterances. Our spokespersons, fund-raisers and grass-roots organizers will show us how to implement their sage advice.”5
Defeating the Biodiversity Treaty
All of this could be dismissed as flatly ridiculous were it not for its central role in the UN Convention on Biological Diversity and its near religious support by nearly all of the environmental NGOs. Agenda 21 and the Biodiversity Treaty would permit a restructured and unaccountable UN Trusteeship Council to regulate any human activity that presents potential harm to biological diversity. Secretary General Kofi Annan’s July 18, 1997 UN Reform plans, “[the Trusteeship Council will] be reconstituted as the forum through which Member states exercise their collective trusteeship for the integrity of the global environment and common areas…. At the same time, it should serve to link the United Nations and civil society in addressing these areas of global concern.”6 In principle, this mandate would cover all human activity, given that almost anything humans do is deemed as harmful to biological diversity.
Background on The Wildlands Project – North Western Research Institute (nwri.org)
They hate individuals living off the land. They hate humanity in general.
Things like this start to make more sense to you when you realize and understand all the above. This is an anti-human system being emplaced.
Source: Believe it or not, it may be illegal to grow your own food Sustainable America
Vegetable gardens no longer banned in Florida | CNN
Local Laws Ban Front Yard Food Gardens in Cities Across the US (earthisland.org)
Only Two States Have Passed ‘Right to Garden’ Laws. Will Others Follow? | Civil Eats
Woman Faces Jail Time For Growing Vegetable Garden in Her Own Front Lawn - ABC News (go.com)
by Dillon Critique From; (substack)
